819 route du Mas Rillier,
69140 Rillieux La Pâpe, Lyon, ARH, FR
04.82.53.84.08
Pour les pros... 04.82.53.84.08
support@1fo.fr
support@1fo.fr

Massachusetts Casino Repeal Matter Approved by Court

Massachusetts Casino Repeal Matter Approved by Court

Massachusetts State Attorney General Martha Coakley opposed the repeal concern, but says she welcomes allowing the voters to truly have a voice on the problem. (Image: Boston Globe)

In Massachusetts, casino companies have actually faced a few battles in order to build resorts in the state. There have been town-by-town campaigns to win over local communities, and in the truth of the more Boston area, a competition that is fierce only one license. Now, operators are going to have yet another challenge ahead of those before they can sleep easy: a statewide repeal vote that could end casino gambling in Massachusetts before it starts.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled Tuesday that voters should be able to see the casino law repeal concern on a November ballot, possibly rolling straight back a 2011 law that legalized casinos into the state. That move leaves potential casino operators in an awkward position, as they may receive licenses, but maybe not know until later this year whether they can actually do such a thing with them.

Unanimous Decision Places Question on Ballot

The court reached their decision unanimously, pointing out that supporters of the repeal had succeeded in gathering more than enough signatures to put the question on the ballot. The work had been compared by Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, now a Democratic candidate for governor, who rejected the question last year it could violate the property rights of casino owners and developers because she feared.

But after hearing of the decision, Coakley showed up become fine with all the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) decision.

‘i am pleased that the Supreme Judicial Court has ruled on this presssing problem of great interest to voters in Massachusetts,’ Coakley said. ‘ I am pleased that they have made a determination that now lets this go directly to the ballot. And we are working these days to certify the concern.’

Coakley did include that she planned to vote contrary to the proposition, as did Governor Deval Patrick.

‘It is exactly what it is,’ Patrick said. ‘I’m going to vote for keeping expanded gaming on the books. I think it is a balance that is great how we expand gaming and exactly how we let our local communities make decisions being right for them.’

Fierce Battle Expected

Polling on the presssing issue is sparse so far. A Suffolk University poll earlier this month unearthed that only 37 percent of voters in Massachusetts approved of casinos, but another from the Boston Globe unearthed that 52 percent of most likely voters would still vote against a repeal. The ground that is shaky which the casinos stands means that the repeal vote could drop to the campaigns on both edges.

While not all casino firms commented on the decision immediately, those who did said that they would work difficult to convince voters to allow the casinos be built. Mohegan Sun released a declaration saying that they would reveal to voters that the statutory law was ‘good for employees, good for the economy and good for the commonwealth.’ Penn National, which has currently won the state’s only slots parlor permit, stated they would also be participating in an informational campaign.

‘For us, this campaign will be about education, it’ll be about informing voters about most of the jobs that are in stake here,’ said Penn spokesperson Eric Schippers.

Meanwhile, casino opponents are gearing up for a fight. That may mean that lots of regional anti-casino teams is banded together to combat the expensive campaigns the casinos are expected to run, with Repeal the Deal likely to be a leading opposition group.

Bwin.Party Not for Sale, Says Board

Chief executive of bwin.party Norbert Teufelberger and his board deny rumors that the company is searching for a sell-off (Image: onlinecasinoarchives.com)

Bwin.Party is rumors that are denying it is searching for an purchase, or even to offer off a few of its assets. The company happens to be the subject of a flurry of speculation following an article this week by Bloomberg which claimed that it was looking to offer off all or part of its company so that you can revive its flagging fortunes.

Bwin.Party, through its relationship with the Borgata, is the provider that is largest of online poker in brand New Jersey, with over 40 percent of the market share, but its operations have been faltering in European countries recently. The author of the Bloomberg piece, Christopher Palmeri, said that he had received the information from ‘two individuals with knowledge regarding the matter’ whom wished to keep nameless. Bwin.Party had hired Deutsche Bank AG (DBK) to think about its options, claimed the sources, and would make a decision within two months.

The company itself waded in to quash the rumors, stating categorically that the company is not for sale while Bwin.Party’s shares, which had been declining of late, climbed by 4 percent on the London Stock Exchange in the wake of the rumors.

No Plans to Sell

‘The Board of Bwin.Party has noted the recent speculation in the media regarding a possible break-up or sale for the company,’ read the business’s official statement. ‘Since his appointment as Chairman month that is last Philip Yea has been using the executive management group on ways where the Group increases shareholder value, however we can verify there are no plans to break-up or sell the business.’

Palmeri speculated into the Bloomberg article that the supposed sell-off had been prompted by a difficult 2013, which saw revenue across all gambling operations tumble 19 percent to €652.4m ($887,971,854).

He quoted an interview with Bwin Chief Financial Officer Martin Weigold in March in which Weigold had blamed ‘regulatory and competitive challenges in lots of markets’ for a slump in income, and added that the business ended up being looking to ‘divest non-core and surplus assets.’

Palmeri also wondered perhaps the purchase of PokerStars to Amaya Gaming and its prospective return to the US market had rattled Bwin.Party. PokerStars, he wrote, ‘could accelerate the start that is wobbly online betting in three states, while introducing more competition for Bwin yet others for all gamblers.’

2013 A Turning Point

However, Bwin.Party, it self the product of a merger between pioneering online sportsbook and poker sites Bwin and Party Poker, respectively, recently said that it had been extremely pleased with its poker operations in brand new Jersey, and that it would be looking to consolidate its market-leading position in there on the next year, aswell as getting into lightning-link-slot other states that might legalize online gambling within their borders, such as for example Pennsylvania which it described as a ‘significant business opportunity.’

Speaking in reaction towards the company’s disappointing 2013, chief executive Norbert Teufelberger ended up being recently positive: ‘2013 had been a challenging year for our business, but it addittionally marked a switching point as we increased our concentrate on regulated and to-be-regulated markets, started initially to roll-out brand new and refreshed versions of our mobile and desktop services and products, and commenced the transformation of our technology infrastructure through the adoption of the Agile development methodology,’ he stated. ‘Having streamlined the form and size of our business we’ve got the fundamentals to come back our company to sustainable growth.’

PokerStars Could Return to Brand New Jersey Market by Fall

Founders Mark and Isai Scheinberg, whose treatment from the PokerStars equation might facilitate an entrance to the New Jersey market. (Image: onlinpokerreport.com)

PokerStars’ carefully orchestrated sale to Amaya Gaming for $4.9 billion looks want it might well repay for the world’s poker site that is biggest. The ink was still running down the page on that $4.9 billion contract when New Jersey gaming officials announced that they had met with representatives from Amaya, and this week they told the Associated Press that they were optimistic that PokerStars could be able to join the New Jersey market as early as this fall.

Documents in the Loop

Officials from the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE), which regulates and licenses gambling in the state, said that Amaya has already begun submitting the necessary documents to New Jersey regulators to utilize for a situation license.

In the coming months, the division is going to be scrutinizing the post-acquisition corporate framework associated with business, along with the executive and administration personnel plus the pc software platform itself to help make sure it is consistent with nj-new jersey regulatory standards.

PokerStars has long held designs on the New Jersey market. In 2013, anticipating legalization and regulation within the state, its parent company, the Rational Group, experimented with buy the ailing Atlantic Club casino in Atlantic City, in order to secure the acquisition of a state gaming license, and from there, it hoped, a license to operate online poker after regulation. However, the deal dropped through, and almost a year later on the Atlantic Club was forced to file for bankruptcy and lay off its 1,600 staff. It was sold in for $23.4 million, to be stripped for parts december.

Federal Indictments

The reason given for the deal’s collapse had been the concerns over outstanding federal indictments on the business’s father-son founders, Isai and Mark Scheinberg. The indictments related to PokerStars’ failure to cease offering gambling to American citizens after the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) of 2006 had made it illegal to take action. After Black Friday, PokerStars paid a $547 million fine to your Department of Justice, which it hoped would absolve the Scheinbergs, however the issue flared up once again when PokerStars attempted to apply for a permit in the run up to legalization.

On 11, 2013, New Jersey’s Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE) announced it would suspend its review of ‘Stars online gaming license for two years december. The DGE said in a statement that may have inspired the acquisition strategy

‘The Division (within the two-year period) may think about a ask for relief to reactivate the application if significantly changed circumstances are demonstrated…the Division’s investigation of PokerStars and its affiliated entities and connected individuals is resumed to evaluate suitability.’

Resorts Deal

Having removed themselves from the equation by selling to Amaya, the Scheinbergs may at last witness the company they built go back to the US.

However, at least into the case of New Jersey, it will be as a software provider, not an operator, much in the manner that 888 Holdings provides software to Caesars and the WSOP.com brand. PokerStars has a deal set up with Resorts World, which owns the Resorts Casino resort in Atlantic City. That relationship will remain intact, inspite of the acquisition, and Resorts has said it intends to make use of both the PokerStars and brand that is fullTilt should the outfit be provided with the chance to do therefore.

‘We welcomed the present announcement by Amaya Gaming Group, Inc of its plans to obtain Rational which we expect will move the regulatory approval process ahead,’ said Resorts Casino Hotel owner Morris Bailey. ‘PokerStars could be the leading world-wide brand in on line gaming so we want forward to our future with them in brand new Jersey.’


Recommended Posts

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Ce site utilise Akismet pour réduire les indésirables. En savoir plus sur comment les données de vos commentaires sont utilisées.